From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262048AbTLBL6Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:58:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262070AbTLBL6Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:58:25 -0500 Received: from orion.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.90]:40722 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262048AbTLBL6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 06:58:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future Message-ID: <20031202120315.GK13388@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200312011226.04750.nbensa@gmx.net> <20031202115436.GA10288@physik.tu-cottbus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202115436.GA10288@physik.tu-cottbus.de> X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Organization: Conectiva S.A. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu: > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the > chair and the keyboard. So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a kernel that is phasing out? - Arnaldo