From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: bug in COW? - Re: [uml-user] uml 2.6.0-test9 crash Message-ID: <20031206181815.GA11475@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200312060005.hB605IAv008253@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:18:15 -0500 To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, uml-user On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > If there is a way where the above can be done without having to use > bitkeeper then I am all set. There's no requirement at all to use BitKeeper. Feel free to send me patches in any reasonable form you want, which in your case would probably just be patches. I also make plain patches available, so there's no need for BK in order to get my tree. Also, my 2.4 tree, which is where new stuff is added first right now, is just in CVS. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel