Re: policy under version control

[Tom <tom@lemuria.org>]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 08:59:15PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> arch is obsolete now, and replaced with tla.

True.


> So I could maintain my own private repository, keep it up to date with
> changes to selinux, while still maintaing a revision history of my
> changes.

Exactly. I am, for example, still missing my subversion policy from the
default thing. Instead of buggering people to include it, I could
simply set it up in my own repository and be done.


> There also are a few issues that take a bit of getting use to,
> especially if you are use to CVS. For instance, you don't commit
> individual files like in CVS, you commit a number of files in one go,
> and the revision of the entire project gets incremented (eg.  similar so
> a changeset in Bitkeeper or a commit operation in Subversion).

I've been using Subversion for well over a year now with a small team
of developers, and those changes are really easy getting used to.


-- 
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub  1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
     Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4  29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.