From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@zwane.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] make cpu_sibling_map a cpumask_t
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:59:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031208155904.GF19412@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FD3FD52.7020001@cyberone.com.au>
> I'm not aware of any reason why the kernel should not become generally
> SMT aware. It is sufficiently different to SMP that it is worth
> specialising it, although I am only aware of P4 and POWER5 implementations.
I agree, SMT is likely to become more popular in the coming years.
> I have an alternative to Ingo's HT scheduler which basically does
> the same thing. It is showing a 20% elapsed time improvement with a
> make -j3 on a 2xP4 Xeon (4 logical CPUs).
>
> Before Ingo's is merged, I would like to discuss the pros and cons of
> both approaches with those interested. If Ingo's is accepted I should
> still be able to port my other SMP/NUMA improvements on top of it.
Sounds good, have you got anything to test? I can throw it on a POWER5.
Anton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-08 4:25 [PATCH][RFC] make cpu_sibling_map a cpumask_t Nick Piggin
2003-12-08 15:59 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2003-12-08 23:08 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-09 0:14 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-12-11 4:25 ` [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 7:24 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 8:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 11:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 13:09 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 13:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 13:30 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 13:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 15:30 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 15:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 15:51 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 15:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 16:37 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 16:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-12 1:52 ` [PATCH] improve rwsem scalability (was Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler) Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 2:02 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-13 0:07 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-14 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-17 5:27 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-19 11:52 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-19 15:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-20 0:08 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 0:58 ` [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler Rusty Russell
2003-12-11 10:01 ` Rhino
2003-12-11 8:14 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 16:49 ` Rhino
2003-12-11 15:16 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 11:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 17:05 ` Rhino
2003-12-11 15:17 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 16:28 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-12-11 16:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 2:24 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-12 7:00 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 7:23 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-13 6:43 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-14 1:35 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-14 2:18 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-14 4:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-14 9:40 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-14 10:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-16 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-16 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-17 0:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-17 0:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-17 0:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-16 17:34 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-15 5:53 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-15 23:08 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-19 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-19 5:13 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20 2:43 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-21 2:56 ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-03 18:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-15 20:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-12-15 23:20 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-16 0:11 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-12-12 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-12 15:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-08 19:44 ` [PATCH][RFC] make cpu_sibling_map a cpumask_t James Cleverdon
2003-12-08 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-08 20:51 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-12-08 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-08 23:17 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-08 23:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-08 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-08 23:46 ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-09 13:36 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11 21:41 ` bill davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-09 4:54 Nakajima, Jun
2003-12-09 19:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031208155904.GF19412@krispykreme \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zwane@zwane.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.