From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: pinotj@club-internet.fr, torvalds@osdl.org, hch@lst.de,
neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, manfred@colorfullife.com, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:21:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031209072131.GD24599@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031209020322.GA1798@frodo>
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:03:22PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> [ Christoph, is this failure expected? I think you/Steve made
> some changes there to use __GFP_NOFAIL and assume it wont fail?
> (in 2.4 we do memory allocations differently to better handle
> failures, but that code was removed...) ]
It looks like the slab allocator doesn't like __GFP_NOFAIL, we'll
probably have to revert the XFS memory allocation wrappers to the
2.4 versions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-09 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-09 0:57 Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray) pinotj
2003-12-09 2:03 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-09 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-12-09 23:58 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-12 19:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-12 20:07 ` Manfred Spraul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-04 18:27 pinotj
2003-12-04 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 21:21 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 9:34 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 3:00 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 6:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-04 21:26 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-03 23:06 pinotj
2003-12-03 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-29 17:41 pinotj
2003-12-02 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-02 1:37 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 6:44 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 18:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 20:05 ` Nathan Scott
2003-11-27 18:42 pinotj
2003-11-27 18:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-02 1:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-25 17:30 pinotj
2003-11-25 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-27 18:07 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-22 7:47 Re: " pinotj
2003-11-22 10:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-21 18:12 pinotj
2003-11-21 18:58 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-20 1:50 pinotj
2003-11-20 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-19 18:19 pinotj
2003-11-20 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031209072131.GD24599@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=pinotj@club-internet.fr \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.