All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: const versus __attribute__((const))
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:56:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312091256.47414.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FD57C77.4000403@zytor.com>

On Tuesday 09 December 2003 08:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Well, I get no warning from the following code, with gcc 3.2.2 and -W
> -Wall:
>
> int foo(int x)
> {
>    int y, z, w;
>
>    asm("movl %1,%0" : "=r" (y) : "r" (x));
>    asm("movl %1,%0" : "=r" (z) : "m" (y+1));
>    asm("movl %1,%0" : "=r" (w) : "m" (33));
>
>    return z+w;
> }

For reference, both gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 (snapshot) give produce the same assembly 
as gcc-3.2 for your code, but give this warning:

test.c:6: warning: use of memory input without lvalue in asm operand 1 is deprecated
test.c:7: warning: use of memory input without lvalue in asm operand 1 is deprecated

	Arnd <><


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-09 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-08 15:46 const versus __attribute__((const)) Arnd Bergmann
2003-12-08 17:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-08 18:27   ` Nikita Danilov
2003-12-08 18:31     ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09  2:59       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-09  3:21         ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09  3:49           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-09  5:37             ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09  7:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-09  7:40                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09 11:56                   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2003-12-09 15:42                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09 16:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-09 16:51                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-09 19:15                           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-09  7:19             ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-08  1:19 H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-08 12:32 ` Nikita Danilov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200312091256.47414.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.