From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264144AbTLJV4f (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:56:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264255AbTLJV4f (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:56:35 -0500 Received: from lpbproductions.com ([68.98.208.147]:23706 "HELO lpbproductions.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264144AbTLJVzX (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:55:23 -0500 From: "Matt H." To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:55:33 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> In-Reply-To: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312101455.34154.lkml@lpbproductions.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org My personal view is this shouldn't merged. 2.4 shouldn't have more new features. That's what 2.6 is for. Matt H. On Wednesday 10 December 2003 02:39 pm, Michael Frank wrote: > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged. > > Regards > Michael > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/