From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:22:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org>
Hi!
> swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and
working, but it is still a hack.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-12 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 21:39 RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-11 19:36 ` Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:55 ` Matt H.
2003-12-12 19:22 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-12-14 4:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-12-14 11:03 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.