From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262038AbTLLVbt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:31:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262052AbTLLVbt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:31:49 -0500 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:35535 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262038AbTLLVbp (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:31:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:31:37 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.24-pre1: ask for CONFIG_INDYDOG only on mips Message-ID: <20031212213137.GE1825@fs.tum.de> References: <20031210204628.GA9103@fs.tum.de> <20031211225819.GA20373@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031211225819.GA20373@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:58:19PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:46:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > A dependency on a possibly undefined variable doesn't work with the 2.4 > > config system, and "make oldconfig" asks me on i386 for CONFIG_INDYDOG. > > Applied - I hpe that's that last one of this kind lurking somewhere ... Thanks. Was the removal of the i386 Mwave support option in the same patch an accident that should be reverted, or was there a reason for it? > Ralf cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed