All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
To: Svetoslav Slavtchev <svetljo@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:46:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031212234627.GA1256@node1.opengeometry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2641.1071270545@www59.gmx.net>

On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:09:05AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> if you just want muliple X users bruby/ ruby should work as stable as
> 2.4 /2.6 (works at least for 20-25 people i helped, reading the howto
> and getting it up),
> 
> but if you want multiple virtual terminals, you'll have to experiment :-)
> and read a lot the linuxconsole ml, as it's not yet documented 

Multiple X users (via xdm login) is what I'm looking for.  X-terminal is
the canonical answer.  In the light of recent development in PXE support
which effectively eliminated third-party packages like Etherboot,
Netboot, Rom-a-matic, and LTSP,  I was wondering if it's possible to go
the next logical step and eliminate motherboard/case as well.

This would be ideal for home market, where you want multiple users (ie.
kids) but with only one PC.  Sell it as "Linux Mainframe"... :-)

-- 
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
Linux solution for data management and processing. 

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-12 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-12 22:27 Multiple keyboard/monitor vs linux-2.6? Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 22:45 ` William Park
2003-12-12 23:09   ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12 23:46     ` William Park [this message]
2003-12-13  1:05       ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-13 10:20       ` John Bradford
2003-12-13 10:28         ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
     [not found] <fa.da53dsa.dho216@ifi.uio.no>
2003-12-12 21:43 ` William Park
2003-12-13 13:14   ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-13 21:12     ` William Park
2003-12-15 12:18       ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-15 20:38         ` William Park
2003-12-15 17:18       ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-12 10:03 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-12-12  9:12 Boszormenyi Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031212234627.GA1256@node1.opengeometry.net \
    --to=opengeometry@yahoo.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svetljo@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.