All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Christian Meder <chris@onestepahead.de>,
	Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4 regression when running gnomemeeting
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 19:31:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312201931.49831.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1071897314.1363.43.camel@localhost>

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:15, Christian Meder wrote:
> I just tried hammering on the sound drivers on the playback side. So I
> put on a kernel compile, a find | cat >/dev/null and ogg123 playback.
> Playback performed largely unimpressed from the load level, no skips or
> whatever. Even adding a gnomemeeting connection didn't decrease audio
> playback.

Great, this is more the performance I'm used to hearing about.

> My guess is that the audio drivers are ok even more so because 
> otherwise OSS _and_ ALSA would be broken for my soundcard.
>
> That would leave me with two possibilities: 2.6. is doing something
> different in the gnomemeeting case or gnomemeeting is doing something
> different in the 2.6 case. A cursory look at the gnomemeeting sources
> didn't give me the impression that it's doing anything which would be
> affected by 2.6 deployment but I'll ask on the gnomemeeting-devel list
> for advice.

Threads perhaps?

Sounds more like a resource collision of some sort. IRQ conflict? Spurious 
interrupt? Were you facing Mecca when you ran it?

> Thanks for all your help, I hope I can nail it soon,

Good luck and keep us informed.

Con


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-20  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-19 20:11 2.6 vs 2.4 regression when running gnomemeeting Christian Meder
2003-12-19 20:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-19 23:30   ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  0:21     ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  0:37       ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  0:48         ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  1:11           ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  1:26             ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  1:52               ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  2:38                 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  2:55                   ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-20  3:32                     ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  3:50                       ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  4:16                         ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  4:32                           ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20  5:15                             ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20  8:31                               ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-12-20 11:19                               ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-20 16:17                                 ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20 16:49                                 ` Christian Meder
2003-12-20 17:42                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-21  1:40                                     ` Christian Meder
2003-12-21  8:57                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-22  1:19                                         ` Christian Meder
2003-12-22  1:47                                           ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-22  8:48                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-20 23:29                                   ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20 22:20                         ` Matthias Andree
2003-12-21 19:23                           ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-22 10:54                       ` Andrew McGregor
2003-12-22 11:15                         ` Con Kolivas
2003-12-22 12:51                         ` Ingo Molnar
2003-12-22 13:25                         ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-20 19:34 ` Marc Schiffbauer
2003-12-21  1:49   ` Christian Meder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200312201931.49831.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=chris@onestepahead.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.