All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Subject: [PATCH] another minor bit of cpumask cleanup
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 18:00:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031221180044.0f27eca1.pj@sgi.com> (raw)

Ingo Oeser pointed out to me in private email that one of the cpumask
macros was broken - the macro for for_each_online_cpu() starts its loop
with _any_ cpu from the provided mask, and only worries about restricting
itself to _online_ cpus when looping to the next cpu:

include/linux/cpumask.h:
> #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu, map)                                   \
>         for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mk_cpumask_const(map));              \
>                 cpu < NR_CPUS;                                          \
>                 cpu = next_online_cpu(cpu,map))

Looking further, I see this macro is never used, and its subordinate
inline macro next_online_cpu() used no where else.  What's more, it's
redundant.  Calling it with a map of "cpu_online_map" (which you have to
do, given it's broken thus) is just as good as calling the macro right
above, "for_each_cpu()", with that same "cpu_online_map". Indeed the
only uses of "for_each_cpu()", in arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c,
do pass "cpu_online_map" explicitly, in 5 of 6 calls there from.

So, having found a piece of code that is broken, redundant and unused,
I hereby off the following patch to remove it.

Thank-you, Ingo.


# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#	           ChangeSet	1.1497  -> 1.1498 
#	include/linux/cpumask.h	1.2     -> 1.3    
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/12/21	pj@sgi.com	1.1498
# Remove a couple unused, redundant, confused macros
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h	Sun Dec 21 17:37:14 2003
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h	Sun Dec 21 17:37:14 2003
@@ -17,22 +17,9 @@
 #define cpu_online(cpu)			({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
 #endif
 
-static inline int next_online_cpu(int cpu, cpumask_t map)
-{
-	do
-		cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, map);
-	while (cpu < NR_CPUS && !cpu_online(cpu));
-	return cpu;
-}
-
 #define for_each_cpu(cpu, map)						\
 	for (cpu = first_cpu_const(map);				\
 		cpu < NR_CPUS;						\
 		cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu,map))
-
-#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu, map)					\
-	for (cpu = first_cpu_const(map);				\
-		cpu < NR_CPUS;						\
-		cpu = next_online_cpu(cpu,map))
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_CPUMASK_H */


-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373

             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-22  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-22  2:00 Paul Jackson [this message]
2003-12-22  2:14 ` [PATCH] another minor bit of cpumask cleanup William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-22  6:47 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-22  7:19   ` Paul Jackson
2003-12-22  8:57     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-22 12:32       ` Paul Jackson
2003-12-23  1:45     ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-23 10:10       ` Paul Jackson
2003-12-24  1:26         ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-24  3:18           ` Paul Jackson
2003-12-24 10:55             ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031221180044.0f27eca1.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.