From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AYHTd-0004aI-Vv for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:15:29 -0800 Received: from i164-068.nv.iinet.net.au ([203.59.164.68] helo=cp.yi.org) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AYHTc-0005et-Su for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:15:29 -0800 Received: from erdos.home ([10.0.1.2] helo=erdos) by cp.yi.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AYHTZ-0008FE-00 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:15:25 +0800 Received: from cameron by erdos with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AYHTX-0000og-00 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:15:23 +0800 From: Cameron Patrick Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML on Alpha Message-ID: <20031222041523.GA1023@erdos.home> References: <20031220052032.GC1152@erdos.home> <200312211644.39563.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312211644.39563.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:15:23 +0800 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 04:44:38PM +0100, BlaisorBlade wrote: | Are you working on 2.4 or 2.6? I'd suggest the second choice, since otherwise | you'll have to duplicate part of the work(recheck patches...). It is true | than 2.6 still waits for some patches applied to 2.4, so you may get some | more troubles(module loading still doesn't work in the vanilla tree, but | search in the archives a few days ago for an up-to-date patch I posted and | disable MODVERSIONS). But by the time you finish the porting, I think(or | hope) that development will have moved to 2.6. I've been working on 2.4 so far. I'm not running 2.6 on any machine at all ATM, and from the sounds of this mailing list, you can't run a 2.6 UML on a 2.4 host? Also, the Alpha is running Debian woody at the moment, and I'm not sure how well that copes with a 2.6 kernel. But thanks for the advice, and I will look at porting 2.6 since it would probably be less painful in the long run. Cameron. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel