From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265069AbTLWJ2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:28:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265066AbTLWJ2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:28:54 -0500 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:45574 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265069AbTLWJ2x (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:28:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:28:47 +0100 To: jw schultz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: SCO's infringing files list Message-ID: <20031223092847.GA3169@deneb.enyo.de> References: <1072125736.1286.170.camel@duergar> <200312221519.04677.tcfelker@mtco.com> <20031223002641.GD28269@pegasys.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031223002641.GD28269@pegasys.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Florian Weimer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jw schultz wrote: > And for the names, perhaps they would care to sue The Open > Group? Not the names, but the comments. 8-) > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/errno.h.html The comments were added in Linux 0.99.1, and I'm not sure what was the source. For example, Linux has: #define ENOTTY 25 /* Not a typewriter */ Solaris: #define ENOTTY 25 /* Inappropriate ioctl for device */ Current POSIX: [ENOTTY] Inappropriate I/O control operation. I couldn't find any historic Minix header files. Minix 2 has: #define ENOTTY (_SIGN 25) /* inappropriate I/O control operation */