Re: [PATCH] Fix byte-swapped ethernet addr for Asante Fast 10/100 PCI Adapter

[ddkilzer@kilzer.net (David D. Kilzer)]

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:05:58AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 01:27, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > >   Original:  00:00:B5:94:71:86  [INCORRECT]
> > >    Patched:  00:00:94:B5:86:71  [CORRECT]
> > >
> > > Is it sufficient to simply check the first two bytes of the mac address
> > > to determine this?  (This is what the attached patch does.  I added a
> > > check for the first byte being 0x00 for the Asante card.)
> > >
> > > Should the first three bytes of the mac address be used intead?  (Note
> > > that I can only identify 00:A0:CC as one of the Lite-On mac addresses
> > > that would be matched by the code segment above.  I don't see a 00:C0:**
> > > entry for Lite-On in the IEEE database.)
> >
> > I'd check the first three bytes (after byte swapping :-) - there's plenty
> > of other OUIs with the leading two bytes zero.
>
> This is a card with an Open Firmware driver or not ? If it has, then
> I'd rather use the OF properties (like name property) to detect this
> specific card and flip the MAC

Please forgive my ignorance, but how do I tell if the card has an OF
driver?  Running "ofpath /dev/eth1" doesn't reveal anything, although
looking at the source for "ofpath" shows me that it doesn't handle
ethernet devices.  I don't see anything under /proc/device-tree/ that
would map to the Asante ethernet card, either.

The card does show up in "lspci" and /proc/pci (obviously).  Would
checking for the PCI vendor/device and subvendor/subdevice be
equivalent to checking for the OF name property?

Thanks!

Dave

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/