All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:25:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031228182545.B20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031228174622.A20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:46:22PM +0000

On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:46:22PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Alan Cox has shed some light on this problem.  He mentions that the
> x86 GDT/LDT stuff changed around 2.5.30, which is the time when others
> have also reported that their APM has stopped working.  I've not
> confirmed whether that is the case for me as well, but it seems to
> be highly likely.
> 
> I also asked Alan if there's the possibility of backing this out or
> making it configurable, but the answer seems to be a most definite
> no.  However, maybe Ingo can say otherwise?
> 
> This effectively means that people with laptops which do not work
> with 2.6 APM nor ACPI can expect their machines to be stuck with 2.4
> for the future, unless someone with the necessary knowledge sees this
> problem as important enough to solve.

A quick follow-up from a discussion I've just had with Andi Kleen...
Note that I know nothing about the x86 internals of LDT/GDT/APM stuff,
so I'm clutching at straws here...

Would it be possible to switch LDT/GDT to whatever the APM BIOS expects
just before calling the APM BIOS to suspend/hibernate, and restore them
to whatever Linux requires after the APM BIOS returns from resume?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-28 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-05 16:10 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues) Russell King
2003-12-28 17:46 ` Russell King
2003-12-28 18:25   ` Russell King [this message]
2003-12-28 20:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 11:43       ` Russell King
2003-12-30 16:50         ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:17           ` Russell King
2003-12-30 18:47             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 19:40               ` Russell King
2003-12-30 19:53                 ` Russell King
2003-12-30 23:00                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-31  1:45                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2003-12-31 12:40                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-03  3:43                         ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-03 18:28             ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031228182545.B20278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.