From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz@anda.ru>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>,
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:44:47 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031229074447.D6728@zzz.ward.six> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871xqol5wv.fsf@codesourcery.com>; from zack@codesourcery.com on Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:22:08PM -0800
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:22:08PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> Meh. I personally am convinced that the compiler can do a *much*
> better job, and that trying to improve bits/string.h and
> bits/string2.h is a waste of time; in fact, I've felt that they have
> *always* caused the generated code to get worse, from the day they
> were introduced. I once tried to get Uli to take them out again,
> with hard numbers to back me up, but he ignored me.
Who is Uli - Ulrich Drepper?
> So I have very little interest in pursuing any of your suggestions.
But I don't even try to have you to do so! I'm just trying to
understand what is/was happening. I very don't like the content of
bits/string[2].h too. And I don't want to offend you. I'm very
sorry, if so.
> If you want to keep at them, though, and come up with patches, feel
> free.
Ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-29 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-25 0:20 i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-25 0:38 ` Richard Henderson
2003-12-25 1:15 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-25 1:21 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-25 1:45 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-26 3:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-27 4:58 ` Richard Henderson
2003-12-27 10:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-27 11:35 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-27 18:38 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-28 20:58 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 2:22 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-29 2:44 ` Denis Zaitsev [this message]
2003-12-29 2:46 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-29 2:53 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 3:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-12-29 3:54 ` Andrew Pinski
2003-12-29 6:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-12-29 3:56 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-29 5:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-29 5:55 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-29 18:37 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 19:09 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-29 19:31 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 19:37 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 18:51 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-29 19:15 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-12-27 10:52 ` Denis Zaitsev
[not found] ` <20031225060850.C7419@zzz.ward.six>
[not found] ` <20031225012711.GD13447@redhat.com>
2003-12-25 1:38 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-25 1:53 ` Richard Henderson
2003-12-25 2:08 ` Denis Zaitsev
2003-12-25 0:39 ` Roland McGrath
2003-12-25 1:13 ` Denis Zaitsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031229074447.D6728@zzz.ward.six \
--to=zzz@anda.ru \
--cc=aj@suse.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.