From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal?
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:44:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com> (raw)
I'm running 2.4.23-rc5, and I've been running bonnie, burnMMX and burnK7 for
the last few days on my 3 drive md raid5 array, and I noticed that my
rsects[1] have gone negative. I might consider this normal but /proc/stat
(which only shows hda) doesn't show any negative numbers for the same
stats[2]
Is this a bug?
[1]
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
9 0 319388032 md0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 1 96256 md1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 0 160086528 hdi 240438349 1318355451 -414508366 16504630 101146331 1132637971 1281537580 24939164 -3 18108868 28693926
56 1 96358 hdi1 58 28 178 1500 102 41 292 1710 0 3170 3210
56 2 289170 hdi2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 3 159694132 hdi3 240438290 1318355420 -414508552 16503120 101146229 1132637930 1281537288 24937454 0 19884967 309062
33 0 160086528 hde 240516418 1321486397 -388859454 40325686 90645794 1146603482 1312002136 18444936 -3 14785505 12315041
33 1 289138 hde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33 2 159790522 hde2 240516417 1321486394 -388859462 40325686 90645794 1146603482 1312002136 18444936 0 24147141 26883069
3 0 160086528 hda 240675036 1318323453 -412885008 27008859 110939441 1126008079 1306648420 28401642 -3 24294848 41908774
3 1 96358 hda1 44 53 200 610 102 41 292 1470 0 2010 2080
3 2 289170 hda2 207445 623814 6650072 2773650 7261 19429 224992 63170 0 1882590 2837130
3 3 159694132 hda3 240467546 1317699583 -419535288 24234589 110932078 1125988609 1306423136 28337002 0 4327510 10687939
[2]
cpu 73561013 1160924 31161337 40771206
cpu0 73561013 1160924 31161337 40771206
page 1152185038 1257557610
swap 834055 28177
intr 1291475450 146654480 8 0 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 351908342 0 341855446 0 331412420 0 0 0 0 119644745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
disk_io: (3,0):(352031779,240762616,3890919112,111269163,1325101012)
ctxt 2665965022
btime 1071282031
processes 889037
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 1:44 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-12-30 2:11 ` [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal? Andreas Dilger
2003-12-30 2:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-30 11:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-30 17:27 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.