From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266091AbTLaByR (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:54:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266092AbTLaByR (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:54:17 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:3336 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266091AbTLaByO (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:54:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:54:10 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Rusty Russell Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Paul Jackson , anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioe-lkml@rameria.de, William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make for_each_cpu() Iterator More Friendly Message-ID: <20031231015410.A12194@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Rusty Russell , akpm@osdl.org, Paul Jackson , anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioe-lkml@rameria.de, William Lee Irwin III References: <20031231013046.23B3B2C079@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20031231013046.23B3B2C079@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:26:34PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:26:34PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > Please apply. Applies against 2.6.0-mm2 and 2.6.0-bk3. Yay! > > Anton: breaks PPC64, as it needs cpu_possible_mask, but fix is already > in Ameslab tree. So what about including the fix in the patch? I don't think a fix in some obscure tree is a good excuse to break an architecture in a stable series..