All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ioe-lkml@rameria.de, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make for_each_cpu() Iterator More Friendly
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:53:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031231045528.4E0C22C0CA@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:54:10 -0000." <20031231015410.A12194@infradead.org>

In message <20031231015410.A12194@infradead.org> you write:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:26:34PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Please apply.  Applies against 2.6.0-mm2 and 2.6.0-bk3.  Yay!
> > 
> > Anton: breaks PPC64, as it needs cpu_possible_mask, but fix is already
> > in Ameslab tree.
> 
> So what about including the fix in the patch?  I don't think a fix in some
> obscure tree is a good excuse to break an architecture in a stable series..

Because (1) they've done it already, in anticipation of this change,
and tested it in their tree, and (2) it's a non-trivial patch, as they
don't have a cpu_possible mask concept at all.

FYI, the Ameslab tree is the main PPC64 public tree.

Now, do you need me to explain anything else?
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

      reply	other threads:[~2003-12-31  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-31  1:26 [PATCH 1/2] Make for_each_cpu() Iterator More Friendly Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  1:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-31  4:53   ` Rusty Russell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031231045528.4E0C22C0CA@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.