From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: CPRM ?? Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:30:18 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040102113018.GP5523@suse.de> References: <1073013643.20163.51.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Christophe Saout , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 01 2004, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > Christophe, > > I am sorry but adding in a splitter to CPRM is not acceptable. > Digital Rights Management in the kernel is not acceptable to me, period. > > Maybe I have misread your intent and the contents on your website. > > Device-Mappers are one thing, intercepting buffers in the taskfile FSM > transport is another. This stinks of CPRM at this level, regardless of > your intent. Do correct me if I am wrong. 0 2 4 6 8 10 / / / / / / / PARANOIA-METER -- Jens Axboe