From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@lycos.it>
To: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again)
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:04:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FF5B3AB.5020309@wmich.edu>
On Friday 02 January 2004 19:08, Ed Sweetman wrote:
>
>
> Note, sometimes when moving backwards back to a lower readhead my speed
> does not decrease to the values you see here. readahead on my system
> always goes up (on avg) with higher readahead numbers, maxing at 8192.
> No matter the buffer size or speed or position the ide drive is in.
>
> hdparm -t is difficult to get really accurate, which is why they suggest
> running it multiple times. I see differences of 4MB/sec on subsequent
> runs without changing anything. run hdparm -t at least 3-4 times for
> each readahead value.
>
> I suggest trying 128, 256,512,8192 as values for readahead and skip all
> those crap numbers in between.
>
>
> if you still see on avg lower numbers on the top end, try nicing hdparm
> to -20. Also, update to a newer hdparm. hdparm v5.4, you seem to be
> using an older one.
>
ok, hdparm updated to v5.4
and this is the new script:
_____________________________________________________________________
#!/bin/bash
# This script assumes hdparm v5.4
NR_TESTS=3
RA_VALUES="64 128 256 8192"
killall5
sync
hdparm -a 0 /dev/hda > /dev/null
hdparm -t /dev/hda > /dev/null
for ra in $RA_VALUES; do
hdparm -a $ra /dev/hda > /dev/null;
echo -n $ra$'\t';
tot=0;
for i in `seq $NR_TESTS`; do
tmp=`nice -n '-20' hdparm -t /dev/hda|grep 'Timing'|tr -d ' '|cut -d'=' -f2|cut -d'M' -f1`;
tot=`echo "scale=2; $tot+$tmp" | bc`;
done;
s=`echo "scale=2; $tot/$NR_TESTS" | bc`;
echo $s;
done
_____________________________________________________________________
The results are like the previous.
2.6.0:
64 31.91
128 31.89
256 26.22 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192 26.26 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
2.6.1-rc1:
64 25.84 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
128 25.85 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
256 25.90 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
8192 26.42 # during the transfer HD LED blinks
I have tried with and without "nice -n '-20'" but without any visible changes.
Performance with 2.4:
with kernel 2.4.23 && readahead = 8 I get 31.89 MB/s...
changing readahead doesn't seem to affect the speed too much.
Bye
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux v2.4.23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-02 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-02 16:02 Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again) Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 18:08 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-02 21:04 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2004-01-02 21:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 10:20 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-02 21:32 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-02 22:34 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-01-03 11:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 14:30 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-05 23:19 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 14:59 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 19:23 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-07 20:12 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-07 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-08 7:31 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 1:05 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 19:15 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-09 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-10 14:48 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 16:00 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 16:19 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-01-10 17:29 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-10 17:29 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-03-29 15:45 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-04 17:15 ` Buffer and Page cache coherent? was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-04 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04 23:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-05 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-03 10:20 ` Paolo Ornati
2004-01-03 3:33 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03 4:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-03 13:39 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-03 20:56 ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-01-04 3:02 ` jw schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401022200.22917.ornati@lycos.it \
--to=ornati@lycos.it \
--cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.