Re: file system technical comparisons

["Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>]

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:42:32 +0100 (CET) venom@sns.it wrote:

| 
| http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-10/jfs_01.html
| 
| On some point it could be discussed, but it is a good starting point.
| 
| if you know italian, I will send you another article published in three part
| on Linux&C (http://www.oltrelinux.com) about journaled filesystems available in
| Linux kernel.
| 
| bests
| 
| Luigi
| 
| On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Steve Glines wrote:
| 
| > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:38:22 -0500
| > From: Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>
| > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
| > Subject: file system technical comparisons
| >
| > I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems.
| > At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs
| > and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all
| > supported file systems.
| >
| > Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list.
| >
| > Thanks
| > --
| > Steve Glines

A couple of years ago I did a journaling filesystems comparison
for 2.4.x, so it's quite dated.  I wouldn't pay much attention to
the performance numbers from then.

You can get some other (non-performance) comparison info by looking
at <http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/journal_fs/lwe-jgfs.pdf>.

--
~Randy
MOTD:  Always include version info.