From: Martin Loschwitz <madkiss@madkiss.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mremap() bug IMHO not in 2.2
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:22:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040106092236.GA1211@minerva.local.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401051604550.5970@home.osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:08:36PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> The only page that should matter is likely the one at 0xC0000000, where
> there can be extra complications from the fact that we use 4MB pages for
> the kernel, so when fork/exit tries to walk the page table, it would get
> bogus results.
>
This is right, the proof-of-concept exploit to be found on full-disclosure
exactly uses that memory address.
> Still, I'd expect that to lead to a triple fault (and thus a reboot)
> rather than any elevation of privileges..
>
I agree with Linus. I tested the POC-exploit here on Linux 2.4.22-rc2
and Linux 2.4.23 and everything it does is to simply reboot the box. As
for Linux 2.6.0-test9, I get something like a hangup (the same sound is
played again and again and only reset helps).
I actually am not sure whether this should be called 'local privlige
escalation' or rather 'possibility for Denial of Service attacks'.
> Interesting, in any case. Good catch from whoever found it.
>
> Linus
> -
--
.''`. Martin Loschwitz Debian GNU/Linux developer
: :' : madkiss@madkiss.org madkiss@debian.org
`. `'` http://www.madkiss.org/ people.debian.org/~madkiss/
`- Use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0! See http://www.debian.org/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-06 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-05 14:54 mremap bug and 2.4? Robert L. Harris
2004-01-05 15:21 ` Erik Mouw
2004-01-05 15:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-01-05 15:42 ` Robert L. Harris
2004-01-05 17:10 ` Diego Calleja
2004-01-05 18:23 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-05 18:26 ` mremap() bug and 2.2? Petr Baudis
2004-01-05 22:55 ` mremap() bug IMHO not in 2.2 Petr Baudis
2004-01-05 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-05 23:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-06 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 2:14 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-06 9:22 ` Martin Loschwitz [this message]
2004-01-06 20:36 ` mremap() bug indeed not in 2.2 (confirmed) Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040106092236.GA1211@minerva.local.lan \
--to=madkiss@madkiss.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.