Re: seperator error in __mask_snprintf_len

[Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>]

One side note I should warn of - my breakage (if such it be) was not
consistent.

To quote my original patch to Andrew:

> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:54:28 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] new /proc/irq cpumask format; consolidate cpumask display and input code
> 
> ...
> 
> There are two exceptions to the consolidation - the alpha and
> sparc64 arch's manipulate bare unsigned longs, not cpumask_t's,
> on input (write syscall), and do stuff that was more funky than
> I could make sense of.  So the input side of these two arch's
> was left as-is.  I'd welcome someone with access to either of
> these systems to provide additional patches.

This suggests that while I may well have broken the output side (what
the kernel displays when you read cpumasks in /proc/irq/prof_cpu_mask or
/proc/irq/<pid>/smp_affinity), it is less likely that I broke the input
side (the affect of writing a mask to these files).

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373