From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@lundell-bros.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with 2.4.24 e1000 and keepalived
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:18:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040109131812.11fc4948.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p0602045cbc23ac7a1ada@[192.168.0.3]>
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:00:42 -0800
Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@lundell-bros.com> wrote:
> At 1:45am +0100 1/9/04, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > It's unfortunate that the two conditions are conflated by most net
> > > drivers.
> >
> >IMHO, saying "most net drivers" is unfair : tg3, tulip, 3c59x, starfire,
> >realtek, sis900, dl2k, pcnet32, and IIRC sunhme are OK. eepro100 is nearly
> >OK but has this annoying bug, and only older 10 Mbps drivers don't report
> >their status, often because the chip itself doesn't know.
>
> I'm sure you're right; I should have said most of the drivers that
> I'm using (including e100 &e1000).
Can we find the cause for this obviously buggy behaviour inside the source?
Where is the handling of physical up/down events different in tulip compared to
e100(0) ?
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 19:05 Problem with 2.4.24 e1000 and keepalived Stephan von Krawczynski
2004-01-07 21:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-08 2:45 ` Ben Greear
2004-01-08 5:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-08 8:07 ` Ben Greear
2004-01-08 8:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-08 8:14 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2004-01-08 8:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-08 17:49 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-01-09 0:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-09 1:00 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-01-09 12:18 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2004-01-09 18:43 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-01-09 23:56 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040109131812.11fc4948.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=jlundell@lundell-bros.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.