From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264445AbUAIVmO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:42:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264472AbUAIVmO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:42:14 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:17116 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264445AbUAIVkE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:40:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:41:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kgdb cleanups Message-Id: <20040109134117.4dcd9db8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040109183826.GA795@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040109183826.GA795@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > No real code changes, but cleanups all over the place. What about > applying? > > Ouch and arch-dependend code is moved to kernel/kgdb.c. I'll probably > do x86-64 version so that is rather important. Could you please work this with the kgdb developers? Jim Houston george anzinger "Amit S. Kale" Because merging this might stomp all over work which they have in progress. (But thanks: kgdb does need a cleanup)