From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: linuxppc trees, what is going on ?
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:41:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040110084155.GA19817@iliana> (raw)
Hello,
I am confused about what is going on with the different 2.4 powerpc
trees.
Last year, there was linuxppc_2_4 and the -benh tree. But since december
24, this tree doesn't seem to be touched anymore, and a new linuxppc-2.4
tree is used.
Are we supposed to move to the linuxppc-2.4 tree, and if so, what is
the rationale behind this change.
Furthermore, 2.4.24 was released, and the linuxppc-2.4 now contains
TAG: v2.4.24, and a bit later there is a Changeset marked as "Import
2.4.24 final tree". There used to be TAGS like TAG: v2.4.23_linuxppc_2_4
which i used to take snapshots for releasing debian powerpc kernel
packages. Will there still be those, did they simply get forgotten,
should i sync with the v2.4.24 tags, or am i missing something.
BTW, while we were at renaming stuffs, would it not have been better to
use linuxppc-2.6 instead of the linuxppc-2.5 we currently have ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-10 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-10 8:41 Sven Luther [this message]
2004-01-12 1:21 ` linuxppc trees, what is going on ? Paul Mackerras
2004-01-12 7:32 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-13 17:06 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-13 17:18 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-13 17:35 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-14 8:55 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-18 12:21 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 15:29 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-19 15:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 15:58 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-19 16:38 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 16:48 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-19 17:07 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 17:22 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-19 17:30 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 17:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-19 17:48 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-19 17:49 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-19 17:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-03-15 10:31 ` linuxppc latest ? Armin Schindler
2004-03-16 6:38 ` Kumar Gala
2004-01-19 17:43 ` linuxppc trees, what is going on ? Tom Rini
[not found] ` <20040123154058.GA15605@work.bitmover.com>
2004-01-23 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-13 17:04 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040110084155.GA19817@iliana \
--to=sven.luther@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.