From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
Subject: Re: p4-clockmod doesn't seem to allow the highest possible speed
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:30:03 +0100
Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20040111173003.GA5485@dominikbrodowski.de>
References: <20040109181851.GA1393@grep.be>
	<20040110101534.GA10003@dominikbrodowski.de>
	<20040110110800.GA8294@grep.be>
	<20040110131824.GA5010@dominikbrodowski.de>
	<20040110152145.GA10160@grep.be>
	<20040110154110.GA8735@dominikbrodowski.de>
	<20040110163212.GD10531@grep.be>
	<20040110185308.GZ14031@poupinou.org>
	<20040110193526.GM10531@grep.be>
	<20040111154825.GA14031@poupinou.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============38754366492079884=="
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040111154825.GA14031@poupinou.org>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk
To: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>


--===============38754366492079884==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline


--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:48:25PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> (but that do
> not matter, since you should use p4-clockmod instead of ACPI T-states
> anyway).

What are the advantages of p4-clockmod in favour of ACPI T-states?

	Dominik

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAAYgbZ8MDCHJbN8YRAlnBAJ9xKlAyQb+6wKrdHUknaSCM4ZTq6wCaAh7F
tOBIy0TMfxhgPGL5HxTC3/M=
=ipV8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--


--===============38754366492079884==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq

--===============38754366492079884==--