All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes)
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6] - Patch 028
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:11:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040112191154.GD11990@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040109234608.18009a2a.akpm@osdl.org>

2.6.1-mm2 compiles with NR_CPUSQ2 (and for sn2 btw, thanks), but I
haven't actually booted it on a >256p machine since they're still
somewhat rare :).  Do you think you'll do an official 2.6.2 release
before Linus gets back with this stuff in it?

Thanks,
Jesse

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:46:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Rusty, responding to Andrew, on a cpumask failure seen by Jesse:
> > > Probably.  Paul Jackson acked them though, so I'm a little surprised.
> > 
> > Jesse or Rusty - could you send me the earlier parts of this
> > email thread?  I don't see it on lkml or ia64 email list.
> > 
> > I'd like to see what I missed in Rusty's patch.
> > 
> > Though I am less surprised than Rusty that I missed something;
> > I was in an easy going frame of mind when I read it.  I do
> > tougher reviews when I am more irritated and untrusting.
> > 
> 
> Is OK, looks like Rusty was missing a couple of mk_cpumask_const()
> invokations in a -mm patch.  I'm currently testing this:
> 
> --- 25/include/linux/cpumask.h~make-for_each_cpu-iterator-more-friendly-fix-fix	Sat Jan 10 02:15:29 2004
> +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/cpumask.h	Sat Jan 10 02:16:02 2004
> @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
>  #define cpu_online(cpu)			cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_online_map)
>  #define cpu_possible(cpu)		cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_possible_map)
>  
> -#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)			\
> -	for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mask);		\
> -		cpu < NR_CPUS;				\
> -		cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, mask))
> +#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)					\
> +	for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mk_cpumask_const(mask));		\
> +		cpu < NR_CPUS;						\
> +		cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, mk_cpumask_const(mask)))
>  
>  #define for_each_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_possible_map)
>  #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_online_map)
> 
> _
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-12 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-10  7:46 [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6] - Patch 028 Andrew Morton
2004-01-10 20:30 ` Paul Jackson
2004-01-12 19:11 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-01-12 20:10 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040112191154.GD11990@sgi.com \
    --to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.