From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "prince" Subject: Re: iptables v1.2.7a: can't initialize iptables table `filter' Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:04 -0800 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040113183904.M50828@resoftcorp.com> References: <20040113001933.M22372@resoftcorp.com> <002d01c3d9bb$52e42120$16c8a8c0@goiania.empreza.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <002d01c3d9bb$52e42120$16c8a8c0@goiania.empreza.com.br> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: VJr , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Thanks Vjr. "Verify the modules iptables are compile to your kernel". How do I do this? I am not so good at Linux administration. Prince. On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:55:06 -0200, VJr wrote > Hello! ;) > > Try use > /sbin/insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_filter.o > > iptables -L > > Verify the modules iptables are compile to your kernel (my english > is bad ) > > ;0 > > VJr > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: prince > To: > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:19 PM > Subject: iptables v1.2.7a: can't initialize iptables table `filter' > > > Dear Group, > > > > I am getting the following whenever I tried to do any operation with > iptables. > > > > % iptables -L > > > > iptables v1.2.7a: can't initialize iptables table `filter': iptables who? > (do > > you need to insmod?) > > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. > > > > % rpm -qa | grep kernel > > kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13 > > kernel-2.4.20-28.9 > > kernel-BOOT-2.4.20-28.9 > > kernel-doc-2.4.20-28.9 > > kernel-source-2.4.20-28.9 > > > > % lsmod > > Module Size Used by Not tainted > > e1000 54528 1 > > ext3 61280 2 > > jbd 46804 2 [ext3] > > 3w-xxxx 36192 3 > > sd_mod 11916 6 > > scsi_mod 63416 2 [3w-xxxx sd_mod] > > > > How do I get this resolved? It seems the problem is after I upgraded the > > kernel. I am running RH 9. > > > > Thanks, > > Prince. > > > >