From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: aebr@win.tue.nl, 1@pervalidus.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: The key "/ ?" on my abtn2 keyboard is dead with kernel 2.6.1
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:01:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040114120136.0f3f92ca.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040114182202.GA32081@ucw.cz>
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Thus I propose this patch to make the 2.6 keycodes for Brazillian,
> Korean and Japanese keys compatible with 2.4.
>
>
> ChangeSet@1.1512, 2004-01-14 19:17:00+01:00, vojtech@suse.cz
> input: Move around Fxx and Japanese/Korean/Brazil keycode definitions
> to be compatible with 2.4.
This changes the table in drivers/char/keyboard.c in ways which conflict
with the below patch. It changes the same keycodes, but differently.
Should the below patch be dropped, or is further resolution needed?
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz> writes:
> KEY_INTL2 182 /* Hiragana / Katakana */
> KEY_INTL3 183 /* Yen */
>
> These keycodes are translated back to the PS/2 scancodes in raw mode.
Sounds like 2.6.1 has the bug.
Currently does,
HIRAGANA INTL2(182) 7d
YEN INTL2(182) 7d
But, these should be
HIRAGANA INTL2(182) 70
YEN INTL3(183) 7d
---
25-akpm/drivers/char/keyboard.c | 2 +-
25-akpm/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/keyboard.c~keyboard-scancode-fix drivers/char/keyboard.c
--- 25/drivers/char/keyboard.c~keyboard-scancode-fix Tue Jan 13 09:55:54 2004
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/char/keyboard.c Tue Jan 13 09:55:54 2004
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static unsigned short x86_keycodes[256]
360,261,262,263,298,376,100,101,321,316,373,286,289,102,351,355,
103,104,105,275,287,279,306,106,274,107,294,364,358,363,362,361,
291,108,381,281,290,272,292,305,280, 99,112,257,258,359,113,114,
- 264,117,271,374,379,115,125,273,121,123, 92,265,266,267,268,269,
+ 264,117,271,374,379,115,112,125,121,123, 92,265,266,267,268,269,
120,119,118,277,278,282,283,295,296,297,299,300,301,293,303,307,
308,310,313,314,315,317,318,319,320,357,322,323,324,325,276,330,
332,340,365,342,343,344,345,346,356,270,341,368,369,370,371,372 };
diff -puN drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c~keyboard-scancode-fix drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
--- 25/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c~keyboard-scancode-fix Tue Jan 13 09:55:54 2004
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c Tue Jan 13 09:55:54 2004
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static unsigned char atkbd_set2_keycode[
0, 49, 48, 35, 34, 21, 7, 89, 0, 0, 50, 36, 22, 8, 9, 90,
0, 51, 37, 23, 24, 11, 10, 0, 0, 52, 53, 38, 39, 25, 12, 0,
0,181, 40, 0, 26, 13, 0, 0, 58, 54, 28, 27, 0, 43, 0,194,
- 0, 86,193,192,184, 0, 14,185, 0, 79,182, 75, 71,124, 0, 0,
+ 0, 86,193,192,184, 0, 14,185, 0, 79,183, 75, 71,124, 0, 0,
82, 83, 80, 76, 77, 72, 1, 69, 87, 78, 81, 74, 55, 73, 70, 99,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-14 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-11 15:45 BUG: The key "/ ?" on my abtn2 keyboard is dead with kernel 2.6.1 Murilo Pontes
2004-01-11 20:35 ` Frédéric L. W. Meunier
2004-01-11 23:47 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-11 23:50 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-12 2:17 ` Frédéric L. W. Meunier
2004-01-12 8:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-12 12:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-14 14:24 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-14 14:44 ` John Bradford
2004-01-14 14:40 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-14 18:22 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-14 19:29 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2004-01-14 19:41 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-14 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-01-14 21:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-14 22:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-19 10:59 ` Go Taniguchi
2004-01-12 11:30 ` Murilo Pontes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040114120136.0f3f92ca.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=1@pervalidus.net \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.