From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:21:53 +0000 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040114152152.GB5496@redhat.com> References: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF392@txexmtae.amd.com> <20040113230605.GM14674@redhat.com> <20040114101041.GB16737@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114101041.GB16737@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: paul.devriendt@amd.com, pavel@ucw.cz, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > > Part of the justification for cpufreq (at least on x86) was an alternative > > for when ACPI just doesn't work, or for when folks either don't want to, > > or can't run ACPI (through various other AML bugs for eg). > > Except that the ACPI P-States implementation also uses the cpufreq > infrastructure. Sure, but that came later.. Dave