From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:34:30 +0900 (JST) Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040115.223430.100570163.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20040114.210427.104284595.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Return-path: To: vnuorval@tcs.hut.fi In-Reply-To: Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org In article (at Thu, 1= 5 Jan 2004 15:00:24 +0200 (EET)), Ville Nuorvala sa= ys: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] =B5=C8=C6=A3=B1=D1= =CC=C0 wrote: >=20 > > I don't think so. Proxy should not depend on netfilter. : > There aren't that many ways of doing this "hack" cleanly. Well... We (or only me?) might have mis-understood the "proxy" in Linux :-P It is not for proxy in rfc2461, is it? It is for proxy in Thaler's draft, isn't it? If so... hmm... let me consider... --yoshfuji