From: Greg Fitzgerald <gregf@bigtimegeeks.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slowwwwwwwwwwww NFS read performance....
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:04:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040118060404.GA20769@evilbint> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074193256.2148.55.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>
Ever since i upgraded to 2.6 my NFS performance has dropped.
I have a OpenBSD Server running nfsd. The other boxes on my lan
running windows and or the 2.4.x kernel have no performance problems.
Files transfer at normal speeds for a 100mbit connection. My main workstation
which is running 2.6.1-mm4 (i have also had 2.6.1 and 2.6.0 on it) has
almost zero nfs performance. I get at the most 500K/s. Anyone have ideas?
I upgraded to -mm4 having seen some NFS fixes in the patch but none of them
seem to have applied to my situation. Thanks in advance.
--Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-18 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-06 0:46 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 13:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 22:30 ` bill davidsen
2004-01-08 12:48 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 17:49 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 18:13 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 18:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 19:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-09 10:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-09 18:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 0:38 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 1:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 11:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 14:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 20:04 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 21:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 22:14 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 22:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 22:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 22:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-11 13:18 ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-11 13:53 ` Russell King
2004-01-11 14:24 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-15 11:38 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-12 5:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-12 14:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-12 15:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-16 5:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-16 6:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-16 6:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 22:34 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 22:52 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 22:57 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 23:00 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-08 21:42 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-12 23:18 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-12 23:28 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-13 0:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-14 3:00 ` Daniel Roesen
2004-01-14 18:16 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-13 1:55 ` Slow NFS performance over wireless! Roman Gaufman
2004-01-13 2:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-13 20:25 ` Joshua M. Thompson
2004-01-13 20:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 1:12 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
[not found] ` <20040115013312.GO1594@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
2004-01-15 2:04 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-15 2:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 19:00 ` Slowwwwwwwwwwww NFS read performance Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 19:53 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-15 20:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 20:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-18 6:04 ` Greg Fitzgerald [this message]
2004-01-18 17:55 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-16 0:52 ` Slow NFS performance [was: over wireless!] Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040118060404.GA20769@evilbint \
--to=gregf@bigtimegeeks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.