From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:35 +0000 Subject: General questions Message-Id: <20040118214002.68ebd352.khali@linux-fr.org> List-Id: References: <20040118125025.3102d486.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <20040118125025.3102d486.khali@linux-fr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org > Oops, I moved my bk trees, and didn't tell anyone :( > > The tree previously at bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/usb-2.5 is now at: > bk://kernel.bkbits.net/home/gregkh/linux/gregkh-2.6 > I don't know if there is web access to that tree or not, sorry. Don't think there is. I think this leaves me no other choice than to give a try to bitkeeper. I guess it can't hurt, anyway. > I'm also staging the i2c patches to send off to Linus at: > bk://kernel.bkbits.net/home/gregkh/linux/i2c-2.6 This is what I would be primarily interested in. > > 3* Is there a chance that the i2c subsystem could be moved one level > > down in the configure tree? I wonder why we live in "Character > > Devices". The i2c subsystem is big enough to have its own > > subdirectory, so I would expect it to appear in "Device Drivers" > > directly. > > Heh, I had that same idea a few days ago, and already did it in my > trees with the following patch. Perfect :) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/