From: Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
To: christian graf <chr.graf-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: acpi_processor.c - kernel 2.6.1
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:37:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040119093703.GD11081@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1074447711.719.13.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 06:41:51PM +0100, christian graf wrote:
> I thought for full performance the C1 state is better as the C2 (which
> keeps good performance as well as powersavings)? Or why do you prefer
> C2?
C1 and C2 have much less influence to both performance and powersaving than
the various P-States...
Dominik
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-19 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-17 23:43 acpi_processor.c - kernel 2.6.1 christian graf
[not found] ` <1074382993.674.24.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 2:58 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20040118025845.GB25416-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 17:41 ` christian graf
[not found] ` <1074447711.719.13.camel-GKM3wtwTCu0@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-19 9:37 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-01-18 11:18 ` Yury V. Umanets
[not found] ` <1074424728.1914.24.camel-YqzrDssuZYw@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 13:00 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <400A8381.2050607-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 17:10 ` Mattia Dongili
[not found] ` <20040118171017.GF2375-MEqNC12sBsHxa7XIdbXXog@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 18:04 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <400ACAC3.1050504-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-18 19:28 ` christian graf
2004-01-18 17:39 ` christian graf
2004-01-19 14:10 ` Ducrot Bruno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-18 8:14 Yu, Luming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040119093703.GD11081@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux-x3ehhduj6siigcdfoqap7bvvk+yq3zxh@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=chr.graf-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.