From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] Have qla2xxx driver bind fcports. Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:49:44 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040119134944.515440b0.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1074532278.1645.24.camel@mulgrave> <20040119214030.78010.qmail@web10408.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:38887 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264927AbUASVti (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:49:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040119214030.78010.qmail@web10408.mail.yahoo.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael W. Shaffer" Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org "Michael W. Shaffer" wrote: > > > As far as the resync goes, I'd like to wait a while just to > > see if any more bugs turn up in the ioctl/failover separation > > piece ... it will be easier to debug if we have fewer changes, > > so how does early 2.6.2 sound for this (depending, of course, > > on when that actually is)? > > Thanks to everyone for figuring this out so quickly. Should I > assume that this fix will be merged into 2.6.1-mm5 or so, and > eventually into 2.6.2? I'll probably continue to do some beta > testing on this system with the patches I have now, but I > would most likely wait until the LUN fix is into the -mm tree > before trying to move into production with it. > I added Andrew's patch to -mm. I'll get -mm5 out today. James is suggesting 2.6.3-pre for merging this patch. That may be conservative: we've only just started in on the post-2.6.1 work, so 2.6.2 is a while off yet.