From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265326AbUATBrT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:47:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263441AbUATBrR (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:47:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:19412 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265326AbUATBnd (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:43:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:17:34 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rusty Russell Cc: Mike Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brian King , Christoph Hellwig , kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro Message-ID: <20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com> References: <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> <20040120005915.2A54A17DD8@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040120005915.2A54A17DD8@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write: > > Rusty, > > Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending. > > Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were > frozen. > > This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or > a work of obvious beauty and genius? Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this? > Doesn't put things in sysfs, but Greg was working on that for module > parameters... Greg? Oh yeah, I'll dig out that patch later this week. An older version has been sitting in my bk tree forever, need to update it with the last changes you sent me. thanks, greg k-h