From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265289AbUATLOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:14:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265352AbUATLOm (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:14:42 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:63748 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265289AbUATLOm (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 06:14:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:14:41 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.1-mm5 Message-ID: <20040120111441.A14570@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20040120000535.7fb8e683.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040120000535.7fb8e683.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:05:35AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Any reason you keep CardServices-compatibility-layer.patch around? Having a compat layer for old driver around just for some architectures, thus having drivers that only compile on some for no deeper reasons sounds like an incredibly bad idea. Especially when that API is not used by any intree driver and only in -mm ;) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:14:41 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: 2.6.1-mm5 Message-ID: <20040120111441.A14570@infradead.org> References: <20040120000535.7fb8e683.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040120000535.7fb8e683.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:05:35AM -0800 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Any reason you keep CardServices-compatibility-layer.patch around? Having a compat layer for old driver around just for some architectures, thus having drivers that only compile on some for no deeper reasons sounds like an incredibly bad idea. Especially when that API is not used by any intree driver and only in -mm ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org