From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ingress Shaping using IMQ
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:45:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401201845.51967.stef.coene@docum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F73B338A7FD943B7937BBCF99BFBDE2DB8BC@mail.sofaware.com>
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 15:05, Aron Brand wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> Thanks for the helpful information.
>
> What do I need to set as the line rate for the LAN side shaper? I assume
> that if I want it to work it must be slower than the real downlink speed
> - is this right? Are there recommended values - such as 10% lower than
> the real downlink speed?
It depends. But try 10% and measure the link usage.
> I am wondering, has anyone done any benchmarks that indicate how
> accurate is shaping of TCP streams in the inbound direction? For
> example, say that during peak periods the customer wants to enforce 20%
> of the traffic to web and 80% to FTP downloads, how long will it take
> until it stabilizes on these rates? And how accurate can I expect it to
> be?
It can be very accurate and very fast. Like said before, it depends on the
software you use and how quick to software reacts on a change in the
bandwidth.
I did some bursts test with htb. You can see on some of the graphs that if
there is an other tcp stream, htb reacts very fast. But this only for
outoing packets and measered on the loopback interface. So the problem is
not htb, but application, routers, modems, ...
http://docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/htb/burst/
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-20 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-19 13:19 [LARTC] Ingress Shaping using IMQ Aron Brand
2004-01-19 18:27 ` Stef Coene
2004-01-20 14:05 ` Aron Brand
2004-01-20 17:45 ` Stef Coene [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-24 17:39 [LARTC] Ingress shaping " Fernando.SCamargo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401201845.51967.stef.coene@docum.org \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.