From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>, Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: NAT before IPsec with 2.6
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:51:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401230751.40618.teastep@shorewall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401231521350.13626-100000@filer.marasystems.com>
On Friday 23 January 2004 06:24 am, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> > I.e. the postrouting on the unencrypted packet is really called right
> > before it gets encrypted. And the encrypted packet then hits the
> > POSTROUTING again, but it's already a different packet, actually.
>
> My issue is with packets not destinated for an IPSec tunnel.. from what I
> read your patch these will hit POSTROUTING twice. But maybe I misread your
> patch?
I'm concerned that passing the unencrypted packet through POSTROUTING
apparently makes it impossible for firewall rules to enforce encryption to a
remote host or network.
It's my opinion that when the ipsec<n> devices where eliminated, the baby got
thrown out with the bath water.
My $.02...
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-23 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-21 12:29 NAT before IPsec with 2.6 Michal Ludvig
2004-01-23 6:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-23 12:31 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-23 13:31 ` Michal Ludvig
2004-01-23 14:24 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-23 14:40 ` Michal Ludvig
2004-01-23 15:56 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-23 15:51 ` Tom Eastep [this message]
2004-01-24 8:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-24 9:21 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-24 9:27 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-27 10:39 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-27 11:57 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-27 13:07 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-27 13:22 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-27 14:12 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-27 20:51 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-27 22:35 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-28 13:48 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-27 22:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-27 23:55 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 0:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-28 0:09 ` [PATCH]Re: " Harald Welte
2004-01-28 8:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-01-28 9:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-01-28 10:30 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 11:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-28 13:39 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 15:58 ` Tom Eastep
2004-01-28 13:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-01-28 14:23 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-02-01 14:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-02-16 1:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-02-18 14:57 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <20040218220337.GA3193@alpha.home.local>
2004-02-20 1:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-04 22:30 ` [PATCH]: latest netfilter+ipsec patches Patrick McHardy
2004-03-04 23:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-03-04 23:42 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-05 2:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-05 2:13 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-10 2:45 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-11 22:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-12 0:15 ` Alexander Samad
2004-03-05 1:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-05 11:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-03-04 23:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-03-05 11:39 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 10:30 ` [PATCH]Re: NAT before IPsec with 2.6 Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-29 19:05 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-27 19:54 ` Michael Richardson
2004-01-27 13:27 ` Valentijn Sessink
2004-01-27 13:57 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-01-27 21:13 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-28 8:58 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 10:21 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-28 13:00 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 13:43 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-28 14:24 ` 2.6.2-rc2 and nf-log Wojciech 'Sas' Cieciwa
2004-01-28 19:38 ` NAT before IPsec with 2.6 David S. Miller
2004-01-27 16:11 ` Tom Eastep
2004-01-27 20:45 ` Harald Welte
2004-01-28 15:36 ` Tom Eastep
2004-01-27 19:51 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401230751.40618.teastep@shorewall.net \
--to=teastep@shorewall.net \
--cc=hno@marasystems.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.