From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <20040127001252.A21930@cs.mcgill.ca> From: Navindra Umanee Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 + Linux 2.6.1 questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3Cyw1xektm3edc=2Efsf=40ford=2Eguide=3E=3B_from_M=E5ns_Ru?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?llg=E5rd_on_Mon=2C_Jan_26=2C_2004_at_04:42:55PM_+0100?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Jan 27 00:14:02 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote: > > 2) Why do I see, for example, a /dev/mapper/v01-home entry, > > instead of /dev/v01/home, when running 'df' and 'mount'? I > > see that /dev/mapper/v01/home symlinks to > > /dev/mapper/v01-home, which must account for this, though I > > thought that because I'd specified /dev/v01/home, that it'd > > appear as such? Not that this really matters I suppose ;-) >=20 > I see the /dev/vg/link name. Mine shows /dev/mapper/vg-link too. I would definitely prefer /dev/vg/link because at least it's not implementation dependent... but I guess it's mostly an aesthetic thing. Any idea why yours is different? Different version of mount maybe? Using mount-2.11z here... Later, Navin.