From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Mapping con=pts to a port instead of con=port
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:39:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401280439.i0S4dJZw005512@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:34:40 +1030." <20040124050440.GF4203@erizo.shearer.org>
dan@shearer.org said:
> The same effect can be achieved with termnetd, with the advantage of
> your in.telnetd solution that you aren't building in complexity that
> doesn't belong to UML, but without the clomp-clomp finesse telnetd
> achieves :-)
Yeah, but it has uncleanlinesses of its own (like the need to generate a config
file on the fly), but it's cleaner than what I have now.
My major problem with it is that attaching consoles to ports will stop working
for some number of users if I switch to termnetd, and I'm willing to put up
with some amount of nastiness inside UML if it increases the size of the
userbase that UML works for out of the box.
That concern would be somewhat assuaged if UML were generally installed with
packages that could be made to depend on termpkg, but I think that's not the
case.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-28 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-24 5:04 [uml-devel] Mapping con=pts to a port instead of con=port Dan Shearer
2004-01-24 8:26 ` [uml-devel] " Dan Shearer
2004-01-28 4:39 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401280439.i0S4dJZw005512@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=dan@shearer.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.