From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: NetBSD port and a couple of remarks Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:59:38 +0100 Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040128235938.7f44f970.ak@suse.de> References: <20040128132614.A49402@demos.bsdclusters.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040128132614.A49402@demos.bsdclusters.com> Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Kip Macy Cc: Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:28:32 -0800 (PST) Kip Macy wrote: > > (c) Notwithstanding any other terms in this License, this License is not > > available to You if You and/or your employer develop, produce, sell, > > and/or resell a product which contains substantially similar capabili- > > ties of the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reasonable opinion of Bit- > > Mover, competes with the BitKeeper Software. This one is the killer. If you ever touched the source of any VCS or work for a company who might ship one (and many big software companies have similar programs) then you cannot use it. Also it is vague enough that you could basically get sued anytime. They just have to define some product you're involved in as "competing with bitkeeper" Who knows, maybe Xen will compete with some obscure feature of BitKeeper at some point? -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn