From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: visyz@visyz.net Subject: Pentium III (Coppermine) cpufreq support Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:16:00 -0500 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040129051600.GA6087@visyz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk So, I think I'm one of the 3 people in the world who have a Mobile Pentium III (Coppermine). The other two aren't making any noise about how this sucker's SpeedStep is supposed to work. Any suggestions? Heh. Yeah. anyways. I have an HP Omnibook 4150B, which amounts to the aforementioned coppermine (with speeds from 233-450mhz), on a 440BX/ZX/DX bridge. I tried out the test program to see if it's usable, and while 1 bit did change, it was in GOP 0x0034, not 0x0038. Or maybe that's the other way around. Basically, the one that was supposed to change didn't, and the one that wasn't, did. Are those in charge of the cpufreq development interested in getting the dump still, or have you moved on to bigger and better (tm) processors? ~Gibby