From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Collins Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:04:51 +0000 Subject: Re: SILO 1.4.2 released Message-Id: <20040130170451.GD1788@phunnypharm.org> List-Id: References: <20040129182954.GK532@phunnypharm.org> In-Reply-To: <20040129182954.GK532@phunnypharm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:37:32AM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > >I'm a little disappointed. I haven't gotten any feedback from people > >testing this new version. So either no one cares, or it works good and > >people don't want to waste their time sending "worked for me" emails :) > > well, I get this (attached) on a Dual UE2, running debian/unstable, with > silo-1.4.3 > (deb package) and linux-2.6.2-rc2 (3.5 MB). > On the other side, linux-2.4.23-rc4 (2.9 MB) boots fine. both kernels > booted nicely with silo-1.3.2. I don't except 2.6.2-rc2 to work at all. Use rc1, or wait for later than rc2. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/