From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <20040201000247.9959.qmail@web11001.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:02:47 -0800 (PST) From: Xupei Liang Subject: Re: IDE status timeout To: Tord Andersson , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org In-Reply-To: <021d01c3e6aa$f370f180$0280a8c0@emil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi, Tord, Thank you. The timing looks fine. The system is working except that this problem happens very intermittently. Regards, Terry Liang --- Tord Andersson wrote: > Hi, > > Have you checked the WR, RD and CS timing against > the CF spec. For some hardware setups you might need > to > add some wait states. (That's what made my system > work). > > Kind regards, > > Tord > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xupei Liang" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 7:13 AM > Subject: IDE status timeout > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a customed board that is running Linux > 2.4.19 > > and XFS and that has a compactFlash card. The > > compactFlash card is running in true IDE mode. I > ran > > into the following error once in a while. It is > very > > difficult to reproduce. > > > > >hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } > > >hda: no DRQ after issuing WRITE > > >ide0: reset timed-out, status=0x80 > > >hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy } > > >hda: drive not ready for command > > >ide0: reset timed-out, status=0x80 > > >end_request: I/O error, dev 03:02 (hda), sector > 71472 > > > > >end_request: I/O error, dev 03:02 (hda), sector > 71480 > > > > >end_request: I/O error, dev 03:02 (hda), sector > 77264 > > > > >end_request: I/O error, dev 03:02 (hda), sector > 77272 > > > > >end_request: I/O error, dev 03:02 (hda), sector > > 115537 > > >I/O error in filesystem ("ide0(3,2)") meta-data > dev > > 0x302 block 0x1c351 > > > > > > > I read some discussions on a similar (or same?) > > problem in another forum. > > > > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.3/index.html#1111 > > > > But my problem seems to be different because even > a > > soft reset can not reset the card and the problem > > happens very randomly. The compactFlash card seems > to > > be stuck. Has anybody seen this problem before? > > > > Thank you in advanced for your input. > > > > Regards, > > > > Terry Liang > > > > > > > > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/