From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: More waitpid issues with CLONE_DETACHED/CLONE_THREAD
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:52:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040202005212.GA26719@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402011333020.2229@home.osdl.org>
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 01:41:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Here you go. The bug turns out not to be related directly to
> > CLONE_DETACHED. Compile testcase with -DNOTHREAD to use fork (well,
> > clone, but without the fancy flags), without -DNOTHREAD to use
> > CLONE_DETACHED | CLONE_THREAD.
>
> I don't think this bug has anything to do with anything else.
>
> This program seems to show that PTRACE_KILL simply doesn't work.
> and the thing is, it looks like the signal handling changes have totally
> made the child ignore the "exit_code" thing, unless I'm seriously
> misreading something.
That may be (though I don't think so) but it reproduces without
PTRACE_KILL too. Try the attached, which just replaced PTRACE_KILL
with PTRACE_CONT/tkill(pid, SIGKILL). Still get zombies. I haven't
tried reproducing entirely without ptrace yet.
> Roland, you know this code better than I do. Any comments?
>
> I suspect the PTRACE_KILL logic should also do a
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(child->sighand->siglock, flags);
> sigaddset(&child->pending->signal, SIGKILL);
> set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(child->sighand->siglock, flags);
>
> ptrace_detach(child);
>
> which would set the SIGKILL thing properly, but I suspect we had a good
> reason not to do it that way originally.
>
> Daniel?
I doubt there was a good reason. This code hasn't changed in a hell of
a long time - it probably predates everything up there except sigaddset
:).
/* -DBUG to kill the parent before the child -> hang. */
/* -DNOTHREAD to us fork instead of clone. */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
int stack_one[8192], stack_two[8192];
int thread_func_two()
{
write (1, "Thread 2\n", 9);
while (1)
sleep (1);
}
int thread_func_one()
{
int ret;
char retstr[10];
write (1, "Thread 1\n", 9);
ptrace (PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0);
write (1, "Thread 1 signalling\n", 20);
syscall (SYS_tkill, getpid (), SIGUSR1);
write (1, "Thread 1 cloning\n", 17);
ret = clone (thread_func_two, stack_two + 8192,
#ifdef NOTHREAD
SIGCHLD,
#else
CLONE_DETACHED | CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_SIGHAND | CLONE_VM | CLONE_FS,
#endif
NULL);
sprintf (retstr, "= %d\n", ret);
write (1, retstr, strlen (retstr));
write (1, "Thread 1 sleeping\n", 18);
while (1)
sleep (1);
}
int main()
{
int ret, wstat;
int child = fork(), child2 = 0;
if (child == 0)
return thread_func_one();
ptrace (PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, child, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE | PTRACE_O_TRACEFORK);
ret = waitpid (child, &wstat, __WALL);
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0);
ret = waitpid (child, &wstat, __WALL);
ptrace (PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG, child, 0, &child2);
ret = waitpid (child2, &wstat, __WALL);
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0);
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child2, 0, 0);
#ifndef BUG
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child2, 0, 0);
syscall (SYS_tkill, child2, SIGKILL);
ret = waitpid (child2, &wstat, __WALL);
#endif
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0);
syscall (SYS_tkill, child, SIGKILL);
ret = waitpid (child, &wstat, __WALL);
#ifdef BUG
ptrace (PTRACE_CONT, child2, 0, 0);
syscall (SYS_tkill, child2, SIGKILL);
ret = waitpid (child2, &wstat, __WALL);
#endif
return 0;
}
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-02 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-01 3:25 More waitpid issues with CLONE_DETACHED/CLONE_THREAD Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-01 4:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-01 4:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-01 5:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-01 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-01 22:25 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 0:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-02 2:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-02 2:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-02 0:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-02 2:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-02-02 2:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-02-04 14:22 ` fs/eventpoll : reduce sizeof(struct epitem) dada1
2004-02-05 4:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-02-01 5:12 ` More waitpid issues with CLONE_DETACHED/CLONE_THREAD Linus Torvalds
2004-02-01 5:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-01 5:42 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-01 5:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040202005212.GA26719@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.