From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:14:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 016 release Message-Id: <20040203231455.GB22058@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20040203201359.GB19476@kroah.com> <1075841390.7473.57.camel@nosferatu.lan> In-Reply-To: <1075841390.7473.57.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Martin Schlemmer Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing Lists On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 22:13, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Right now, udevsend and udev are built against klibc (udevsend > > is only 2.5Kb big), and udevd is linked dynamically against > > glibc, due to it using pthreads. This is ok, as udev can > > still be placed into initramfs and run at early boot, it's > > only after init starts up that udevsend and udevd will kick > > in. > > > > I am guessing this breaks group names (and not gid's) in > udev.permissions? Or was support added to klibc? Sorry, that should have read something to the effect that the .rpm is built using klibc, and that udevd can't be build against it yet due to pthreads being used. It's entirely possible to build everything against glibc, and then you get back the group name stuff for the udev.permission file. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266187AbUBCXQq (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:16:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266194AbUBCXQq (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:16:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:59320 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266187AbUBCXPs (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:15:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:14:56 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Martin Schlemmer Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing Lists Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 016 release Message-ID: <20040203231455.GB22058@kroah.com> References: <20040203201359.GB19476@kroah.com> <1075841390.7473.57.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075841390.7473.57.camel@nosferatu.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 22:13, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Right now, udevsend and udev are built against klibc (udevsend > > is only 2.5Kb big), and udevd is linked dynamically against > > glibc, due to it using pthreads. This is ok, as udev can > > still be placed into initramfs and run at early boot, it's > > only after init starts up that udevsend and udevd will kick > > in. > > > > I am guessing this breaks group names (and not gid's) in > udev.permissions? Or was support added to klibc? Sorry, that should have read something to the effect that the .rpm is built using klibc, and that udevd can't be build against it yet due to pthreads being used. It's entirely possible to build everything against glibc, and then you get back the group name stuff for the udev.permission file. thanks, greg k-h